Trump lawyers move to halt FBI review of Mar-a-Lago classified documents


Lawyers for Donald Trump have asked a federal judge to prevent the FBI from continuing to review documents recovered from his Florida estate.

They are calling for the appointment of a special master not connected to the case who would inspect the records recovered and set aside those that are covered by executive privilege – a principle that permits presidents to withhold certain communications from public disclosure.

The request was included in a court filing that takes broad aim at the FBI investigation into the discovery of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

The filing casts the 8 August search, in which the FBI said it recovered 11 sets of classified documents, as a “shockingly aggressive move” and describes the former president and his representatives as having cooperated for months.

“Law enforcement is a shield that protects America. It cannot be used as a weapon for political purposes,” the lawyers wrote on Monday.

Explainer: Why did FBI raid Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate – and what it is investigating

“Therefore, we seek judicial assistance in the aftermath of an unprecedented and unnecessary raid at Mar-a-Lago.”

More on Donald Trump

“This matter has captured the attention of the American public. Merely ‘adequate’ safeguards are not acceptable when the matter at hand involves not only the constitutional rights of President Trump, but also the presumption of executive privilege,” the lawyers wrote.

An aerial view of former U.S. President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home after Trump said that FBI agents searched it, in Palm Beach, Florida
An aerial view of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home

Separately on Monday, a federal judge acknowledged that redactions to an FBI affidavit spelling out the basis for the search might be so extensive as to make the document “meaningless” if released to the public.

But US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart said he continued to believe it should not remain sealed in its entirety because of the “intense” public interest in the investigation.

Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Google Podcasts,  Spotify, and Spreaker

Justice Department officials want to keep the entire document sealed, saying disclosing any portion of it risks compromising an ongoing criminal investigation, revealing information about witnesses and divulging investigative techniques.

Articles You May Like

Mike Tannenbaum’s GM mock draft: A former exec makes 31 first-round picks
Rising cost of sugar driving food prices to record highs – and the worst is yet to come
Israel in ‘heart of crisis’ as PM delays controversial judiciary overhaul
Council tax would be frozen under Labour, says Starmer
What a young woman on Moscow’s most wanted list thinks of Putin and his war in Ukraine